Marblehead Youth Lacrosse Inc C/o John V Thompson
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273270423
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Marblehead, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9783757117
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,991
- Expenses
- $71,528
- Assets
- $95,495
- Liabilities
- $36,250
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN V THOMPSON (PRESIDENT& TREASURER)
- CHRIS GALLUP (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN V THOMPSON (PRESIDENT& TREASURER)
- CHRIS GALLUP (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOHN KELLY (DIRECTORS)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To teach , grow and honor the game of lacrosse in the town of marblehead and every community in Massachusetts by providing leadership, guidance, training and structure to all town and city program's participants.to provide a positive environment for youth to learn the game of lacrosse and have fun doing it and teach kids to respect the game, thier teammates, their opponents and the officials.
What it reported doing in 2015
The organization was successful in meeting it's goals by providing all the elements needed for teaching and coaching over 350 youth players the game of lacrosse.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.5%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.4%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.5% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.