Maple Valley Junior Football Associ Tahoma Football and Cheer Associati

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
911435790
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Maple Valley, WA, USA
Phone
7575761964
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$331,950
Expenses
$256,464
Assets
$534,676
Liabilities
$24,288

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GINNY URSPRUNG (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CHRISSA BARR (FUNDRAISING)
  • MOON COMPTON (ASSISTANT FU)
  • CARRIE EVELAND (APPAREL DIRE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire youth, regardless of race, color, or creed to participate in a vigorous and entertaining activity. To bring youth closer together through the means of a common interest in competitive teamwork, fair play, and fellowship. To acquaint cheerleaders with the fundamentals of organized cheering and danced routines. To teach players the fundamentals of the game while employing the element of safety and intelligent supervision. To teach sportsmanship, in defeat as well as vicotry; honesty of oneself as well as teammates and coaches; and love of the game with the ability to take a few knocks and bumps. To keep the welfare of our youth first, foremost, and entirely free of adult lust for glory.

What it reported doing in 2024

Tahoma junior bears football and cheer was established in 1978 and is one of the 12 clubs operating independently within the narrows youth football league (nyfl). Tbjfc is responsible for its own registration, fund raising, equimpment outfitting, and internal administration (board of directors), and scheduling (e.g. Board meetings, identification and assignment of practice fields, etc.), all consisten with the nyfl rules. About the bears program: what you and your child should know about playing in the bears program: we are members of the nyfl. All coaches have had a mandatory background check, been trained at clinics, attended the required coaching clinics, football coaches have passed the USA football national exam, signed a coach code of conduct, and had concussion training. Every coach is expected to treat children fairly and teach them the positive attributes of individual and team goals. We are a nonprofit organization whose sole purpose is to provide youth football and cheer in local areas for youth between the ages of 6 and 14. We are dedicated to providing the best coaching, equipment, and competition for all who participate in this league. Though this is a competitive league, safety and sportsmanship shall never give way to competition. We believe in and promote the following character values: respect, responsibility, integrity, and sportsmanship.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.2%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 93.9%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $22.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.7%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.08; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.2% of revenue deployed · 93.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $241K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.