Maple Knoll Communities Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 310544277
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Phone
- 5137822400
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,037,968
- Expenses
- $50,440,930
- Assets
- $156,643,833
- Liabilities
- $109,141,296
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN S DATTILO (DIRECTOR & CEO)
- TIMOTHY MCGOWAN (PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW C CRAIG (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARC GEORGE (ASSOCIATE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN S DATTILO (DIRECTOR & CEO): $577,306 total reported compensation
- ROGER E WEIDEMAN II (DIRECTOR & SVP/CFO): $446,129 total reported compensation
- TIMOTHY MCGOWAN (PRESIDENT): $394,863 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Maple knoll communities, inc. Is recognized as a growing provider of outstanding senior communities and services that allows those we serve to thrive in a stimulating and dignified environment. This will be accomplished through creativity and responsible fiscal stewardship.
What it reported doing in 2024
Maple knoll outreach services for seniors staff and volunteers set forth to provide home and community-based services to over 1,000 older adults throughout 35 greater cincinnati communities this past fiscal year. Meals on wheels offered through maple knoll outreach services for seniors provided more than just a nutritious meal. The program addressed issues ranging from senior isolation to a variety of nutrition programs that help clients manage chronic health issues. The meals are delivered to the client's door with the help of staff and 100 trained volunteers, who are often the only people our clients see daily. Together these individuals delivered 74,000 meals to over 425 older adults. In addition, the program has allowed for over 3,250 pounds of good food as well as various cleaning supplies to be delivered to help care for our client's furry friends. Mobility and accessibility are essential for independent living, and transportation is the link that allows access to needed services and activities. Transportation plays a vital role in the lives of older adults in our community and no single solution can meet all the mobility needs of these individuals. Rather, a variety of services and systems are necessary to do so effectively. Maple knoll outreach services for seniors fills this gap in senior care and in the independence of over 550 older adults by driving over 60,000 miles to provide 8,500 non-emergency medical and non-medical trips this past fiscal year. Not stopping there, additional services were offered to help older adults stay afloat during their time of need. These included the offering of a healthy u workshop to better self-manage chronic diseases, facilitating of high school student social service projects to provide lawn beautification to immobile seniors and helping our population navigate their service needs and availability in the community. As proud members of meals on wheels america, maple knoll outreach services provides much more than just a meal and nutrition education. Volunteers go above and beyond for clients and build lasting friendships. These amazing people work together as the ultimate team serving the community of homebound elderly providing an opportunity for them to be active and safe while improving health and increasing longevity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.9%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.96 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.4%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.11; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.9% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $45.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $577K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.