Manush Manusher Jonyo Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473724177
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Carmel, IN, USA
- Phone
- 2176073029
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $235,901
- Expenses
- $153,473
- Assets
- $338,208
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to stand up by deprived people and school college students in their bad times and help them to be self-dependent so that they can live in the society with self-dignity. The activities are categorized in three major divisions: 1 Education Aid 2 Natural Disaster Aid and 3 Medical Treatment Aid. In Education Aid program we focus to build a wonderful next-generation through different types of consultation tracking etc. It is possible that only a few of them even could make big impacts in changing this world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Program #1: Education Stipend Aid - To alleviate the pain of living expenses save students from dropout and catch the dream Around 12 different projects stated below are set to help them at different steps levels from high school to university level. This help is based on school college university systems in Bangladesh. They also receive funds for their families rehabilitations. In 2020 our one student awarded The Prime Minister Gold Award and another student received the Most Successful Disabled Woman Award. Total beneficiaries in 2023 are about 1640+. 12 Projects are stated below: 1.1 One-to-One Monthly Stipends at University Medical 1.2 HSC Monthly Stipend at High School 1.3 Post Grad Monthly Stipend 1.4 University Admission Preparation Monthly Stipend 1.5 University Admission Test Aid Form Fee + Travel Cost 1.6 University Admission Fee Aid 1.7 HSC Admission+ Fee Aid 1.8 SSC Board Exam Fee Aid 1.9 HSC Board Exam Fee Aid 1.10 Education Aid Common Fund One Time Aid 1.11 Education Aid with Collaborations 1.12 Education Aid to Conference Travel. Total beneficiaries are estimated to be near 1070.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 63
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.8%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 84.6%; rating input score 85; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 91.9%; rating input score 92; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.9%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -26.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.8% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $141K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 39 of 45 current checks pass · 6 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes foreign activity
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX FeesForServicesLegal column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX ForeignGrants column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX InformationTechnology column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX OtherSalariesAndWages column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX Travel column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.