Mansion House Foundation at Radley Run Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851861730
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- West Chester, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6106371528
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $101,494
- Expenses
- $56,707
- Assets
- $133,683
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Thomas Hoopes (President)
People named in this filing
- Thomas Hoopes (President)
- Kathleen Kennedy (Secretary)
- Nancy Jones (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Primary exempt purpose - The primary purpose of this Foundation is to restore, preserve and protect the rich history of historic Chester County, Pennsylvania culture of the Battle of Brandywine and their connection with the Mansion House at Radley Run, circa 1700. The goal is to create an enriched experience for the community through education and engagement.
What it reported doing in 2025
Continue to repair and renovate the building. The restoration benefits the surrounding community of 500+ residences as well as the preserving the building and its history for future generations. 2025 included repairs and painting the exterior of the building and repairing a structural porch column.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44.1%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.36; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -32.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $58K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.