Manna - the Durango Soup Kitchen
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841004473
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Durango, CO, USA
- Phone
- 9703855095
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,670,036
- Expenses
- $4,319,952
- Assets
- $5,170,147
- Liabilities
- $106,314
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANN MORSE (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRIS ANDREWS (CO-EXEC. DIRECT): $100,123 total reported compensation
- MARISSA HUNT (CO-EXEC. DIRECT): $100,042 total reported compensation
- ANN MORSE (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $21,431 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of manna soup kitchen is to provide, in the spirit of faith and love, nourishing meals and supportive services in an atmosphere of acceptance and caring for those in need.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community Kitchen & Food Market: Manna's food access programs respond to the diverse ways in which food insecurity manifests, offering both daily meals and groceries. The Take-out Window provides low-barrier food access by serving hot, daily meals five days a week, four hours a day. All are welcome to receive meals with no questions asked and no forms to be filled out. People can select a variety of food and dietary options, centering participant choice. These meals are not only served at Manna, but delivered to partner agencies across the county, addressing rural food insecurity. In 2025, Manna served 43,139 low-barrier, hot daily meals. Located within the Resource Center, Mannas No-Cost Food Market is like a grocery store with refrigerators, produce, shelf stable food items and shopping carts. Participants freely select from an array of nutritious foods based on dietary needs, culturally appropriate and desired food choices. The Food Market is open four days a week and include evening operating hours accommodate those on varied schedules. In 2025, the Food Market had 12,515 visits and distributed 308,396 pounds of food, serving 2,731 unique individuals. Manna prioritizes utilizing high quality, nutrient dense, locally grown produce as often as possible. Our onsite garden grows over 2,000 lbs of produce each year, all of which is distributed at no cost through our market and take-out window.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.3%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $48.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.8%; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.2; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.3% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.