Manna House Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
520822574
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4108893001
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$447,172
Expenses
$737,185
Assets
$2,987,195
Liabilities
$157,781

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DENNIS S CAMERON ESQ (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHELE T HURLEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANTONIO COFFIELD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANTONIO COFFIELD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $113,577 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To offer assistance and support to the homeless, poor and needy of baltimore with services contributing toward their independence and stability.

What it reported doing in 2024

Breakfast club - five days a week, monday through friday, a hot breakfast is served to about 150 people daily. Providing this vital service to the poor and needy of baltimore. Costs $500 for each day's breakfast. In order to help sustain this vital service, we have formed the manna house breakfast club, inviting the faith community, businesses and individuals to become members of the club by funding breakfast for at least one day per year. In addition, we invite club members to come and see the breakfast being served or help serve it if they wish. The day shelter is open monday through friday where the large array of services provided by the agency can be accessed. The drop-in center is open week days. It provides a safe place for the homeless to be out of the heat or the cold. Addl info is on schedule o while in the center, the homeless can access the services offered that include showers, clothes, mail, phone, fax, id, birth certificates, paperwork, afternoon snack, access to health care, and help with applying for medical insurance, temporary cash assistance, food stamps etc. Clients may also apply to enroll in our case management program. Case management - enrollees work with a case manager to determine a hierarchy of needs and also determine obstacles to independence. A program is formulated for the individual to overcome those obstacles in the move toward independence.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 73.2%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.63 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -64.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.05; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.4%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 73.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $540K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $114K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.