Manhattan Youth Football

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300658652
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
6465950076
Rating
54
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$126,781
Expenses
$132,636
Assets
$39,508
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EDWARD LAW (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • EDWARD LAW (PRESIDENT)
  • TAMI LAW (VP/TREASURER/OPERATIONS)
  • DAVID BARRIOS (WEB/MEDIA DEVELOPER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Growth and development of New York city's youth. Serve as ambassador for youth athletics and competition in manhattan. Committed to academic, social and emotional growth for the future leaders of our community to teach them how to be great students and great leaders on and off the field, making them a positive part of the community. Teaching one kid at a time that positive possibilities do exist for each and every one of them.

What it reported doing in 2013

Offering a positive environment for players to grow and achieve on and off the field to be great students and leaders building a community where football enhances their family and community life, making each player understand they are cared about and that their team and coaches always have their backs. Creating a strong pop warner presence in manhattan. Bringing football to the city where it hasn't existed for years. Pop warner is the nfl of youth football and 60-70% of nfl players came from a pop warner youth team.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 19
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 19.1%; rating input score 19
  • Program expense ratio: 18.2%; rating input score 18

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.6%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -42.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 19.1% of revenue deployed · 18.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $24K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.