Man Up Mentoring Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464744524
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
6787493228
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Adult, Child Matching Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,411
Expenses
$98,477
Assets
$63,898
Liabilities
$28,577

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Samantha Wallace (Executive Director and Co-Founder)
  • Carl Wallace (Vice President Emeritus)

Highest reported compensation

  • Samantha Wallace (Executive Director and Co-Founder): $12,057 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mentorship - MAN UP Mentoring Inc. MAN UP established in 2014 is a community-based nonprofit 501c3 charity organization primarily serving at-risk youth in Orlando age 11 through completion of high school or the equivalent focusing on delinquency prevention and intervention by providing social educational and mentoring services. Meeting weekly for two hour mentoring workshops. Serves 52 youth and 28 families annually. Outcomes: 100% of mentees enrolled in program graduate high-school 42% went on to pursue post-secondary opportunities 90% of our mentees read above or on grade level following our literacy tutoring.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mentoriship & Workforce Development - MAN UP Mentoring Inc. MAN UP established in 2014 is a community-based nonprofit 501c3 charity organization primarily serving at-risk youth in Orlando age 11 through completion of high school or the equivalent focusing on delinquency prevention and intervention by providing social educational and mentoring services. In the Fall of 2023 The MAN UP CEO Program launched. A pilot workforce development and mentorship initiative that exposes at-risk youth to various career paths literacy tutoring financial literacy post-secondary planning and youth entrepreneurship while also serving as a deterrent to youth violence and criminal activity. The program culminates with a graduation ceremony. Meeting weekly for two hour mentoring workshops. Serves 52 youth and 28 families annually. Outcomes: 100% of mentees enrolled in program graduate high-school 42% went on to pursue post-secondary opportunities 90% of our mentees read above or on grade level following our literacy tutoring.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 61.5%; rating input score 62
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -116.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.65; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -41.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -42.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -22.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 61.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $61K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $12K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 42 of 42 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.