Mama Scraps Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 872957253
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Fairview Heights, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3144054694
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,285
- Expenses
- $156,026
- Assets
- $267,052
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRITTINI GRAY-CHIQUILLO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- REGINA GRAY (PRESIDENT)
- AYSHA GRAY (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BRITTINI GRAY-CHIQUILLO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- REGINA GRAY (PRESIDENT)
- AYSHA GRAY (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mama scraps contributes to the well-being of black, brown and indigenous individuals creating a comprehensive platform for rest, reconnection, and the revival of ancestral knowledge; offering healing retreats, rest installations, grief supports, and birthwork.
What it reported doing in 2024
Mama scraps received a doula grant (birth justice fund. Awarded to support activities related to weekly parenting groupsand listening circles, bilingual parenting groups monthly lacation gatherings and postpartum healing cermonies.funds are used to support doula care activities which includes stipends, supplies and retreats for extended respite and mother ceremonies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.4%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 44%; rating input score 44
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -118.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.71; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.4% of revenue deployed · 44% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.