MAKE Projects
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883399336
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8586336852
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Job Training
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,625,933
- Expenses
- $1,363,406
- Assets
- $1,263,970
- Liabilities
- $527,074
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANGIE ANCHI MEI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGIE ANCHI MEI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $96,315 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To build an inclusive San Diego through the wealth of food and culture that refugees and immigrants bring to our community.
What it reported doing in 2024
Job readiness program: in order to build the confidence and job skills of our immigrant and refugee participants, make projects offers an eight to twelve week job readiness program in a restaurant and urban farm training platform. Participants have the opportunity to gain real, paid work experience that goes on their resume and helps them learn skills that they could apply to future jobs, build their confidence and communication skills and learn cultural norms of the working environment in the united states. This experience is vital in helping participants secure a job after graduating from make projects job readiness program. This applied learning environment is very beneficial for lower literacy refugee and immigrant women who are not familiar with classroom based learning and different cultural norms. Participants in the job readiness program are paid minimum wage while being trained on the job in a real world setting by make projects staff. All the participants work on site at the restaurant and farm located at 3725 30th street in san diego, California, subsequently relocated to 2920 university avenue in san diego, California. As an organization, 75 percent of our staff time is allocated to these activities. The program is funded by a combination of grants, donations and business income. Given the transitional nature of the program, as participants are only in it for eight to twelve weeks, grants and donations are needed to financially maintain the restaurant and farm.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.5%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 86.5%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $167.5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.1%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 54% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 72.5% of revenue deployed · 86.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $96K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.