Make-A-Wish Foundation of the Texas Plains
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751966883
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2009
- Forms available
- Form 990 2009
- Location
- Amarillo, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8063589943
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $619,456
- Expenses
- $652,126
- Assets
- $560,090
- Liabilities
- $250,413
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The make-a-wish foundation grants wishes to children with life-threatening medical conditions to enrich the human experience with hope, strength, and joy.
What it reported doing in 2009
THE MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS PLAINS GRANTS WISHES TO CHILDREN WITH LIFE-THREATENING MEDICAL CONDITIONS. WISHES FALL INTO FOUR CATEGORIES: I WISH.... TO BE....A FIREMAN, A POLICEMAN, AN ASTRONAUT TO HAVE....A BEDROOM MAKEOVER, A COMPUTER TO MEET....MY FAVORITE FOOTBALL PLAYER, THE NEW YORK YANKEES TO GO....TO DISNEY, TO HAWAII, TO THE WORLD CUP Total cost of wishes granted for the fiscal year were $440,111. Of this amount, $89,836 was contributed by various vendors who provided in-kind contributions such as travel and travel services, transportation, lodging, and other services and use of facilities to complete a child's wish. For financial statement purposes, these amounts are included as contribution revenue and granted wish expense. For form 990, however, the IRS requires the $89,836 of contributed services and use of facilities be excluded from both revenue and expense.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.3%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $481K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $117K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.