Major Health Partners Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237118890
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Shelbyville, IN, USA
Phone
(317) 392-3211
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,163,555
Expenses
$930,017
Assets
$9,239,916
Liabilities
$85,267

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRENT THOMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • JODY BUTTS-DOLDER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN M HORNER (BOARD MEMBER, HOSPITAL CEO)
  • LATISHA IDLEWINE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN M HORNER (BOARD MEMBER, HOSPITAL CEO): $662,728 total reported compensation
  • RALPH MERCURI (BOARD TREASURER, HOSPITAL CFO): $412,594 total reported compensation
  • STEVE BLACK (BOARD MEMBER, HOSPITAL VP OF QUALITY & STRATEGY): $243,586 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The MHP Foundation supports Major Health Partners by cultivating relationships with donors and encouraging charitable gifts. These gifts are used to further advance the care provided by Major Health Partners.

What it reported doing in 2024

Patient and family support and charity care funding: the prescription assistance program disbursed $6,518 to purchase 46 prescriptions for patients who could not afford them. This assistance is short-term for one or two cycles of prescriptions while case managers work, when necessary, to find long term prescription assistance for the patient. The program prevents costly readmissions of inpatients and helps keep outpatients healthy so that they are not admitted for something that could have been prevented with medication. The charity care fund provided $5,854 to assist 79 patients with heart screenings and medical equipment, and provided $2,122 for mental health patients.the patient and family support fund disbursed $7,900 in small healthcare related items for patients during recovery, helping to reduce unneeded stress during their hospital stay. In most cases, the items helped patients transition more successfully to home or a rehabilitation facility. Transportation is an increasing need, and the patient and family support fund helped support that program as well. The "you are not alone" fund disbursed $10,630 to help 37 oncology patients in need with day to day living expenses and special items to increase quality of life.the women's alliance spent $37,420 on projects to help support patients at mhp. They made baby sized christmas stockings for newborn babies, oncology support bags for each patient in treatment at the mhp center for oncology and hematology, and cardiac rehabilitation gym bags for each patient in cardiac rehab at mhp.wound care: $6,336 used to assist a wound care patient.employee projects: $24,747 used to help departments provide better care for their patients through an internal grant process. Employees submit project ideas that would improve functionality, access to care, or project development. This is part of the annual employee fundraising campaign, together we are.the premium assistance fund covered patient bills for $11,152 for 111 patients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 76.9%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99%; rating input score 99; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 63.6%; rating input score 64; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 20.1%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.94; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 76.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $716K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $663K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.