Major Artery Revitalization Committee Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752991585
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2158522068
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,417
Expenses
$12,262
Assets
$30,706
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John Byrne (President)
  • Nanci Miller (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • John Byrne (President)
  • Nanci Miller (Vice President)
  • Christopher Creelman (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Charitable- combating community deterioration. Semi annual projects intended to instruct and inspire local residents in basic aesthetic improvements to their neighborhood and community. The projects include spring gardening projects and holiday workshops. The organization provides all supplies and materials with assistance from volunteer instructors who volunteer their time to oversee the workshops.

What it reported doing in 2024

Charitable - combating community deterioration. Semi-annual projects intended to instruct and inspire local residents in basic aesthetic improvements of their neighborhood and community. The projects include spring gardening project and holiday workshops. The organization provides all supplies and materials and instructors volunteer their time.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -765.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.5; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -61.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.