Majlis Ash Shura of Metropolit New York Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273768840
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3473427004
- Rating
- 34
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Islam
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $737,383
- Expenses
- $468,623
- Assets
- $402,028
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- IBAD WALI (DIRECTOR OF HA): $121,978 total reported compensation
- MUHAMMAD A SAR (EMPLOYEE): $31,513 total reported compensation
- RAHIMA R LEE (EMPLOYEE): $31,293 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide a united platform for the New York Muslim community through advocacy, network building, and representing important issues for marginalized communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Organised fundraising Gala for the community to generate donations and
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 8
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 5
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7.1%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 11
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.4%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 86.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 7.1% of revenue deployed · 11.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 90 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $356K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $122K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.