Maine Curriculum Leaders Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 770687538
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Searsmont, ME, USA
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $113,007
- Expenses
- $68,813
- Assets
- $221,745
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JON DOTY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JON DOTY (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER NICKERSON (TREASURER)
- KRISTA POULIN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide statewide education on curriculum to school districts and other stakeholders in the communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Conferences Events and Webinars...19 member virtual meetings attended by an average 30 curriculum directors 10 virtual coaching meetings attended by an average of 18 instructional coaches July through June biweekly meetings with DOE and Maine Ed. Org. stakeholders Monthly board meetings 2 in person and others virtual 8 in total Full day MCLA board retreat July 15 2025 8 Mentor-Mentee Collaborations for new curriculum leaders Book Studies...Universal design for learning book study-4 virtual sessions 2 groups 30 participants UDL for Leaders-4 virtual sessions 30 participants Coaching Collaborative-Coaching for Impact sessions with 35 participants Outcome Based Grading with Cheryl Dobbertin - 4 sessions 35 participants MCLA Spring Conference - UDL under the MTSS Umbrella - in person with 235 attendees Dangerous Behavior Webinar-October 1 virtual 58 attendees Projects and Partnerships...Maine Principals Association Maine School Superintendents Association.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.4%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.1%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.22; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.4% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $63K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.