Maine Coast Rowing Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 462529512
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Brunswick, ME, USA
- Phone
- 2078378441
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $169,990
- Expenses
- $206,027
- Assets
- $102,414
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIAN THOMKA-GAZDIK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SCOTT BAILEY (OFFICER)
- ANNE HENSHAW (VICE PRESIDE)
- JULIAN THOMKA-GAZDIK (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Maine coast rowing association mission: through recreational and competitive rowing, we foster personal growth, build community, and promote health & fitness for people of all ages & abilities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Maine coast rowing association provides professional rowing instruction to the greater brunswick community. Mcra members have access to a fleet of single sculls, double sculls, and some team options in 4+ & 8+ hulls. The junior team is provided in depth instruction from a team of experienced coaches. Maine coast junior and master members compete in large northeast regattas, including boston's head of the charles and saratoga ny head of the fish. Mcra extends access to all rowers, with scholarships available to those demonstrating financial need.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $206K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.