Mailikukahi Aina Momona Academy

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475658435
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Kaneohe, HI, USA
Phone
8083868956
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Development N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$3,278
Assets
$46,400
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tammy Smith (President)
  • Lee Ann Anuenue Punua (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Tammy Smith (President)
  • Keola Chan (Member`)
  • Lee Ann Anuenue Punua (Executive Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mailikukahi Aina Momona Academy is organized for the preservation, perpetuation and education in matters relating to the Native Hawaiian culture and natural environment of Hawaii. Our primary focus is to nurture and train our youth in Native Hawaiian practices specific to their geographical location of residence to become responsible stewards and advocates of their land base.

What it reported doing in 2025

Mailikukahi Aina Momona Academy consists of a singular program that partners with other educational institutions and non-profit organizations organized around teaching Native Hawaiian culture to provide summer & quarterly educational services to youth and families. Key activities of the organization are teaching from a curriculum specific to their own landbase community.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 9
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 9

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.15; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -43.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -58.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 9.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $300 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.