Maidu Little League Little League Baseball Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680260575
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Granite Bay, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9169967935
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $180,424
- Expenses
- $157,163
- Assets
- $133,243
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dan Gumpert (President)
- Chase Oliver (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Dan Gumpert (President)
- Chase Oliver (Vice President)
- Karel Bustos (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Maidu Little League aspires to be a world-class, educational-athletic organization that provides a high-quality experience in which every athlete: -has fun playing the game -receives high-quality, consistent coaching -always tries their hardest to play at their highest level -exhibits a team first attitude and plays with class -learns life lessons that have value beyond the playing field -builds courage, character and loyalty -commits to improving their local community -learns the skills and strategies of the game and improves as a player -plays on high-quality facilitiesWe are committed to creating a culture in which coaches, parents, fans, umpires and athletes work together to achieve our mission.
What it reported doing in 2024
Faciliate little league baseball for 400+ area youths in the roseville, California area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.9%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $157K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.