Mahube-otwa Community Action Partnership Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 416049474
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Detroit Lakes, MN, USA
- Phone
- 2188471385
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,985,322
- Expenses
- $20,883,630
- Assets
- $8,995,188
- Liabilities
- $3,087,231
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LIZ KUOPPALA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LIZ KUOPPALA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $148,266 total reported compensation
- SAMANTHA AMUNDSON (CONTROLLER): $126,005 total reported compensation
- DANA LAINE (SECRETARY): $1,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To empower people to achieve self-sufficiency.
What it reported doing in 2024
Since 2018, mahube-otwa has been transforming our service delivery model to a whole family approach, shaped by the voices and experiences of the families we serve to create upward mobility for multiple generations of a family. In 2022, the organization further expanded its services to include employment and training. Families (including individuals, youth, seniors) can enter at any of the five levels and are supported to move up to the next level and shore up protections against backsliding: level 1 (safety) 39 households were served by emergency shelter.level 2 (benefits) 4,911 people received energy assistance; 350 obtained safe and affordable housing; 425 children received comprehensive head start services; and 705 children received childcare subsidies so their parents could work or attend school.level 3 (relationship-based coaching) 324 families created goal-oriented action plans with a trained upward mobility coach. 103 families enrolled in climb a weekly accountability commitment to following up on their goals.level 4 (asset-building) 67 families received financial coaching; 121 reproductive health care counseling; 239 seniors received homemaking and chore services to stay in their homes; 418 households had improved energy efficiency in their homes; 1,366 individuals served by the tax aid program.level 5 (leadership development / volunteerism) we supported leadership development of 27 low-income parents and youth in serving their community on advisory boards; kept 163 seniors active in volunteer opportunities in the community; supported 156 childcare programs with quality career coaching; and engaged 149 volunteers in a variety of ways in our programs.while working collaboratively to move people out of poverty and into family-sustaining jobs, mahube-otwa also worked on community level change including first steps toward a tiny home veterans village, supporting the opening of more pod-model family child care, increasing safety and quality of family, friend, and neighbor childcare, supporting former head start children bound for college or trade school, and purchasing a vacant building in mahnomen to remodel into a family resource center, and a building in park rapids for multi-purpose use including an indoor playground. The organization continues to deepen connections with area schools for early identification of families in need to support them before they fall into deeper crisis this is accomplished by operating a new family resource center and working with barr model schools in otter tail county, facilitating the family services collaborative in hubbard county, and working with homeless education liaisons and school social workers in all five counties. In this way, the organization strives to not only have outstanding accomplishments in the current year but to ensure a positive impact for the next generation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 78% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.7%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.7% of revenue deployed · 92.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $148K · 20 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $834K reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 27 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.