Mahp Foundation C/o Mich Assoc of Health Plans

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383394233
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Lansing, MI, USA
Phone
5173713181
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$95,623
Expenses
$95,984
Assets
$103,693
Liabilities
$53,513

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOMINICK PALLONE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DOMINICK PALLONE (PRESIDENT): $329,752 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To collaborate with public and private partners to conduct research projects related to managed care, chronic disease and health care quality improvement; and to provide education and resources for the public and for health professionals about chronic disease.

What it reported doing in 2024

The aces initiative in Michigan will train those who interact with children on a regular basis, including social workers, teachers, community health workers and parents to understand behaviors that exemplify aces. This awareness will help children receive assistance from familiar faces within the community.the cdc-kaiser permanente adverse childhood experiences (ace) study is one of the largest investigations of childhood abuse and neglect. Dr. Robert anda co-authored this research that demonstrated how adults who experienced abuse and neglect, growing up with domestic violence, substance abuse, mental illness or other stresses could negatively alter a child's genes and brain.the mahp foundation works with a variety of health, social welfare and education groups in collaboration with state agencies to grow the basis of this aces grant. The grant allows these partnerships to examine how other states are addressing this issue and how Michigan can raise awareness using dr. Anda's findings. The goal is to educate and train the community to better identify signs of aces in children and help create community based interventions.Michigan ace initiative conference was held on may 8, 2025. The conference addressed the most current information on aces and the intersections with equity. The conference also provided continuing education credits for social workers, teachers, and administrators

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.6%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 96.2%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 27.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.6% of revenue deployed · 96.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $92K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $330K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.