Maharashtra Mandal of South Florida Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261289471
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
- Location
- Delray Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 5614596597
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,000
- Expenses
- $2,242
- Assets
- $57,589
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Neela Inamdar (President)
- Sheetal Pansare (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Neela Inamdar (President)
- Sheetal Pansare (Vice President)
- Hanumant Nabar (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of Maharashtra Mandal of South Florida is to provide a forum to promote cultural ties among people who are interested in the Maharashtrian culture and to preserve and pass on the values of the rich heritage to future generation. The organization will promote various Maharashtrian cultural activities such as music, drama, dance, literature, language and social traditions. The organization also aims to coordinate and encourage its members to participate in charitable efforts locally, nationally and internationally. As an organization devoted to marathi cause, we deliver 7-10 cultural programs along with Marathi Shala and charity fund raisers.
What it reported doing in 2025
Ganesh Chaturthi - Celebration of Lord Ganesha, revered in Marathi culture as the remover of obstacles and the deity of wisdom, knowledge, and new beginnings. The program included traditional prayers, cultural education, devotional music, community gatherings, youth participation, and promotion of Marathi cultural heritage and values.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 83% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 81.3%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 25.69; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 7 filed program accomplishments · $50K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.