Magnolia Wildlife Education Conservation and Rehabilitation In

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932081238
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Olive Branch, MS, USA
Phone
9012544295
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Wildlife Preservation, Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,337
Expenses
$38,868
Assets
$65,601

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBRA CRUM (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DEBRA CRUM (PRESIDENT)
  • DEANNA HARDIN (DIRECTOR)
  • LINDSEY CRUMP (TREASURER/SE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Magnolia wildlife education, conservation and rehabilitation, inc. Is a non-profit organization that aims to educate the public about wildlife and provide care for orphaned or injured animals. Our team provides housing, food, and medical care to ensure that these animals are healthy and ready for release back into their natural habitats. Our ultimate goal is to protect and preserve wildlife for future generations.

What it reported doing in 2024

The program successfully provided housing, nourishment, and medical care to rescued animals, ensuring their full recovery and readiness for release back into their natural habitats. Through these efforts, the team contributed significantly to the protection and preservation of wildlife, fostering healthier ecosystems and safeguarding species for future generations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 44.7%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.69; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 122.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 48.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 63.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.