Magee Rehabilitation Hospital Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232937749
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2155873000
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,238,136
- Expenses
- $4,775,332
- Assets
- $74,955,196
- Liabilities
- $356,909
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RONALD SIGGS (PRESIDENT & SVP DEVELOPMEN)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT KAUTZMAN (SECRETARY): $361,510 total reported compensation
- RONALD SIGGS (PRESIDENT & SVP DEVELOPMEN): $288,148 total reported compensation
- MARK CHILUTTI (ASSISTANT VP DEVELOPMENT): $167,439 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Magee rehabilitation hospital foundation supports the continuum of life needs for people with physical and cognitive disabilities and their families, thus enabling them to achieve their full quality of life. Continued on schedule "o".the foundation strives to provide support for programs, services, education & research at magee rehabilitation hospital and other relevant organizations.
What it reported doing in 2024
The foundation provides support to magee rehabilitation hospital.magee rehabilitation hospital offers programs and services to improve the quality of life for people with physical and cognitive disabilities. Support provided by the magee rehabilitation hospital foundation enhances the care of magee patients and the quality of life of adults with disabilities who return to the community, regardless of whether or not they were patients at magee. Comprehensive patient rehabilitation care addresses the medical, physical, psychological, social, spiritual, vocational and economic aspects of patients and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 90
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $12,113.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.3%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.7; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 95.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $362K · 30 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.