Magazine Point Community Development

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831539068
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Mobile, AL, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,751
Expenses
$364
Assets
$2,892

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Brian Terrell (Vice President)
  • Orlando A Pogue (Chief Executive Officer)

People named in this filing

  • Brian Terrell (Vice President)
  • Rev Franklin (Board Member)
  • Walter Moorer (Community Engagement)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Magazine Point Community Development serves a 290-family area. Our aim is to enhance community well-being by utilizing communication channels to educate and motivate civic engagement improving residents quality of life. We help residents access and utilize home repair renovation services healthcare clinics and food share programs.

What it reported doing in 2025

Introduced sharing information and concerns about absent neighbors. Shared emergency contact details of family and friends. Required for effective complaints: name title employee number department. Include date time reason for complaint and express gratitude when satisfied. Receiving more active participation and input regarding the handouts distributed throughout the year; greater familiarity with neighbors; free flow of information and partisipation during meetings; and interest request for followup information on topics discussed with possitive feedback.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 79.2%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.95; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 42.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 37.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.