Madonnas Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 651256377
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Milwaukie, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5036531595
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,855
- Expenses
- $65,578
- Assets
- $33,520
- Liabilities
- $1,342
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLOW KESSELL-OELKE (President)
- ALLISON STEPHENS (Vice President)
- CALLY MCVAY (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- WILLOW KESSELL-OELKE (President)
- ALLISON STEPHENS (Vice President)
- CALLY MCVAY (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our main purpose is to identify and to provide for the basic needs of disadvantaged teens who are with child - either pregnant or have a child up to the age of 3 years old - and who do not have easy access to or who are not eligible for the necessary support and resources which are typically afforded to adult parents living within the local community.
What it reported doing in 2014
Provided food, clothing, furniture/household goods, toiletries, rental & utilities assistance to 102 teen parents, and 105 children.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 44.1%; rating input score 44
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -51.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42% of revenue deployed · 44.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.