Madison County Library
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 540831592
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Madison, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5409484720
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $358,864
- Expenses
- $356,975
- Assets
- $1,133,362
- Liabilities
- $3,849
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIANE HECKEL (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BONNIE UTZ (LIBRARIAN): $54,651 total reported compensation
- GARY JONES (TREASURER): $24,963 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide library services to madison county.
What it reported doing in 2024
Providing a public library for citizens of madison county, va.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 71% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $58.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.17; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.3%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 14 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $335K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $55K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.