Madera County Child Abuse Prevention Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820576184
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Madera, CA, USA
Phone
5592329753
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Victims' Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$180,221
Expenses
$155,552
Assets
$68,322
Liabilities
$91

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHERINE PADILLA (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER CORNADO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • GABRIELLE SIBLEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • KATHERINE PADILLA (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIELLE PALOMAR (PARENT REP)
  • DEBBIE PACHECO (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The madera county child abuse prevention council (mccapc) supports community efforts in the prevention, intervention, and treatment of child abuse by promoting and facilitating education that strengthens, empowers, and preserves the dignity of individuals and families.

What it reported doing in 2022

Mccpac provides prevention education services, intervention class services, and treatment linkages services, through direct outreach, education, and referrals for children and families for primary prevention through tertiary prevention (at-risk).mccapc provided classes to the following: information and referral: 408newsletters: 5,266paid-advertisements: 0publications, print materials, giveaway items, etc: 8,020 (this includes advertisements)social media (facebook, twitter, instagram etc.) outreach to families: 45,002training, education sessions, one-time workshops: 231total estimated number of individuals reached: 18,052

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.7%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.8% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $156K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.