Maddie's Miracles Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 833430588
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Reading, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6105684141
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $98,336
- Expenses
- $63,061
- Assets
- $58,441
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIK NORDHOY (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- SUZANNE NORDHOY (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ERIK NORDHOY (PRESIDENT & CEO)
- SUZANNE NORDHOY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MAREN MCGETTIGAN (TREASURER & DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the quality of life and outlook for children with profound special needs and their families who care for them. Focusing on children suffering from debilitating neuromuscular disorders such as muscular dystrophy and cerebral palsy, as well as rare genetic disorders such as wiedemann-steiner syndrome, we aim to provide goods, services and opportunities for hope for those who need it the most. We understand the enormous stress and life-long challenges of caring for these children and seek to provide relief and make a difference for families with limited resources.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization has completed one custom ceiling lift for a child with mobility issues. The organization also gifted a handicap accessible van to a family who cares for a child in a wheelchair. We will continue to seek out and help families with similar needs in the years to come.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 82% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 26.5%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 41.3%; rating input score 41
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.9%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 26.5% of revenue deployed · 41.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $26K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.