Madam President Camp Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473456143
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Shawnee, KS, USA
- Phone
- 9136695192
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $131,388
- Expenses
- $130,508
- Assets
- $117,047
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
People named in this filing
- MARY MESSNER (BOARD CHAIR)
- PAM KELLEY (CO-FOUNDER,T)
- LEE SMITHSON BURD (CO-FOUNDER,)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The madam president camp offers girls the opportunity to learn about their gifts and talents and to think about how they want to use their abilities to become authentic, powerful leaders in their communities and ultimately the world.
What it reported doing in 2024
The madam president camp provides girls the ability to: identify themselves as leaders; grow their civic engagement knowledge; take action on issues relevant to them, their peers, or their community; communicate their plans in a variety of forums and formats; discover a path towards actions that aligns with their individual interest, skill sets, and future vision for themselves as female leaders.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 15
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 15.3%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: 15.4%; rating input score 15
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 67.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 15.3% of revenue deployed · 15.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.