Mad Park

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
863268622
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2025
Location
Charleston, SC, USA
Phone
8438601819
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,766
Expenses
$22,348
Assets
$21,667
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHANIE HARVEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DANIELLE GREENMAN (BOARD MEMBER)
  • QUINTEN MILLER (BOARD MEMBER)
  • TERRI STEED (BOARD CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mad park community is a grassroots movement rooted in charleston, South Carolina, dedicated to breaking down health barriers for families and youth. We believe that wellness is a birthright, not a privilege, and our work is centered around making fitness, nutrition, and emotional well-being accessible to all. Through engaging programs, hands-on education, and real-world solutions, we empower families to take ownership of their health and build a foundation of wellness that extends for generations. Our goal is to create sustainable pathways to better health, ensuring that every child, parent, and educator has the tools they need to thrive. "we are not just an organization--we are a movement led by communities, for communities. We believe that true change happens when families, educators, and youth are given the tools to make wellness a generational way of life."

What it reported doing in 2025

Camp mad park -- summer wellness experiencecamp mad park is mad park community's full-immersive summer wellness experience serving scholars ages 5 through 14. The program is designed to expose young people to enriching, real-world experiences that expand their sense of what is possible, built around the same belief that drives all of mad park's work: that access to meaningful, high-quality experiences is a birthright, not a privilege.camp runs across school and community settings monday through friday from 9:00 a.m. To 3:00 p.m. And is structured around weekly immersive experiences led by community professionals and experts in their fields.in the summer of 2025, 25 scholars participated in three weeks of camp mad park programming. Each week was built around intentional exposure experiences, including sessions with a professional culinary chef, photography, bike riding, surfing, horseback riding, and steam activities. For many of our campers, these were entirely new experiences--first times on a board, behind a camera, on a horse, or in a kitchen with a professional chef. Every experience is chosen with purpose: to show scholars a world bigger than what they have seen so far and to plant seeds of curiosity, confidence, and possibility that last long after the summer ends.in total, mad park community delivered 118 instructor-led wellness sessions serving 330 scholars across grades k through 8 at one charleston-area partner school and provided three weeks of full-day camp mad park experiences serving 25 scholars in summer 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.7%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.