Mac Athletics-nfp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814245291
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Bolingbrook, IL, USA
- Phone
- 2247752495
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $135,557
- Expenses
- $129,663
- Assets
- $7,853
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- BRIANT MILLS (DIRECTOR)
- CHRISTINE LEWIS (DIRECTOR)
- AYANNA MITCHELL (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mac athletics nfp cultivates basketball skills in boys and girls while fostering discipline, growth, and readiness to excel in high school basketball and beyond. We stand on the foundation of r.a.p.t.o.r.s. - responsible athletes progressing to optimize real skills. Through experienced coaching, structured player development, and positive encouragement, we prepare athletes not only for success on the basketball court, but also for success in life.
What it reported doing in 2025
Sponsored 15 female athletes to attend a college exposure basketball tournament in Kansas city mo providing them with opportunities for competition basketball skills development and exposure to college coaches and recruiters.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.6%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 60.2%; rating input score 60
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 120.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.6% of revenue deployed · 60.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $78K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.