Mabel T Caverly Senior Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920057689
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Anchorage, AK, USA
Phone
9072761496
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,608
Expenses
$158,498
Assets
$34,019
Liabilities
$13,530

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANN FARLING (DIRECTOR, VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • PAT SLEDGE (DIRECTOR, PRESIDENT)
  • DENISE KNAPP (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • TIM MANWARING (DIRECTOR)
  • BILL FARLING (DIRECTOR)
  • DONNA BROOKS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The center provides programs and services for the elderly. Clients of the center are primarily low income individuals. Programs include social opportunities, transportation, and assistance.

What it reported doing in 2018

Program Services include transportation of members to Center activities and personal appointments, social events, for seniors, wellness education and senior companions. Funding is also used to provide direct assistance to low-income senior citizens to acquire medical services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -27.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $134K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.