M T Sorrell Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 861089936
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012
- Location
- Blairs, VA, USA
- Phone
- 4348363272
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $421,545
- Expenses
- $429,685
- Assets
- $576,734
- Liabilities
- $29,081
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of m.t. Sorrell is to provide housing, services, and training to individuals with intellectual disabilities.
What it reported doing in 2012
M t sorrell is a group home for intellectually challenged adults. The home provided services and training in life skills for adults.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $246K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule M noncash within contributions did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.