M D Anderson Physicians Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760449960
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Phone
7137459600
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,111,619
Expenses
$57,055,814
Assets
$45,182,030
Liabilities
$10,446,155

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

M. D. Anderson physicians network ("mdapn" or the "organization") transfers programs representative of the university of Texas m. D. Anderson cancer center ("mdacc") mission to the broad community. Mdacc's mission is to eliminate cancer in Texas, the u.s., and the world through outstanding programs that integrate patient care, research and prevention, and education for undergraduate students, trainees, professionals, employees, and the public.

What it reported doing in 2012

Disease management program revenue - m.d. Anderson physicians network provides community hospitals with mdacc expertise related to cancer treatment, best practices, and quality management through a comprehensive oncology disease management program based on the mdacc model for cancer treatment. Under this program, the company contracts with community hospitals or systems to be m.d. Anderson certified member affiliates. Oncology services are delivered to patients in the hosts' service areas through a network of contracted local physicians and hospitals that have undergone m.d. Anderson physicians network's rigorous approval process and have agreed to comply with m.d. Anderson physicians network's program requirements. Under a related employer program, m.d. Anderson physicians network provides enrolled patients with (a) professional oncology services that are delivered through a contracted network and (b) comprehensive disease management services. The related employer program saw 793 new patients in fiscal year 2013.form 990, part vi, section a, line 1b: governing body - all of the organization's directors are employed as faculty physicians of m. D. Anderson cancer center, a state agency with whom the organization is affiliated. The role of mdapn board director is uncompensated.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.4%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $55.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $927K · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2012
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.