MCC Educational Foundation

Legal name: M C C Educational Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
382888820
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Scottville, MI, USA
Phone
2317573713
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$92,840
Expenses
$42,354
Assets
$655,795
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marcie McCloskey (President)
  • Dean Raven (Co Vice-President)
  • Carla Mayer (Co Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Marcie McCloskey (President)
  • Dean Raven (Co Vice-President)
  • Carla Mayer (Co Vice-President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support Mason County Central Schools through community engagement and fundraising for educational programs and scholarships.

What it reported doing in 2024

Scholarships given to graduating Mason County Central students for post-secondary education as follows: Wren Nelson-$1,500, Madison Vernier-$500, Jonah Padgett-$250, Isabella Dotson-$750, Logan Kibbey-$250, Aylen Davila-$250, Riley Mast-$500, Emily Adams-$250, Ava Brooks-$500, Brayden Overmyer-$750, Reaghan Brooks-$500, Katie Henne-$1,000, Isabella Dotson-$2,000, Riley Mast-$1,000, Ava Brooks-$845, Marissa Quillan-$1,000, Wren Nelson-$750, Logan Kibby-$750, Owen Shimel-$750, Colton Sanders-$750, Anna Mortensen-$750, Emily Adams-$750, Brayden Overmyer-$750, Braylin Thurow-$500, Bryce Stevens-$500, Gracie Weinert-$750

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64%; rating input score 64
  • Program expense ratio: 89%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.4%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 15.48; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 64% of revenue deployed · 89% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.