Lzhs Bears Athletic Booster Club Nfp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 931950846
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Lake Zurich, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8475404093
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $142,726
- Expenses
- $107,621
- Assets
- $97,464
- Liabilities
- $2,332
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JODI HENNING (PRESIDENT 7/1/24-5/15/25)
- FREDERICK HASEMEYER (VICE PRESIDENT 7/1/24-5/15/25)
- FREDERICK HASEMEYER (PRESIDENT AS OF 5/15/25)
People named in this filing
- JODI HENNING (PRESIDENT 7/1/24-5/15/25)
- FREDERICK HASEMEYER (VICE PRESIDENT 7/1/24-5/15/25)
- FREDERICK HASEMEYER (PRESIDENT AS OF 5/15/25)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Flzhs bears athletic booster club is an action-oriented group of parents, volunteers and administrators who have an interest in supporting the lake zurich high school athletic program. Through dedication and teamwork we support the enhancement of the athletic experience of lake zurich high athletes, their teams, and their fans through the promotion of athletics, school spirit, successful student-athletes, and community awareness of their athletic & academic achievements. We support through fundraising, stand behind strong moral character and good sportsmanship, and promote a winning school spirit through athletics. The role of fundraising shall be to financially support facility upgrades, equipment, capital improvements and other items that are not covered by the school budget .
What it reported doing in 2024
Lzhs bears athletic booster club nfp volunteers/parents run the concessions stand for home football games, and the like. The booster club then allocates some of the proceeds to the individual sports based on the number of volunteers for each sport allocated on a percentage basis with the booster club receiving 25 percent.the club provided senior banners for all senior athletes and made an end-of-season contribution of $200 per sport.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 44% for direct work, and 56% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.1%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 95.6%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 24.6%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.1% of revenue deployed · 95.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $103K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.