Lynns Warriors
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852983966
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6464560643
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,514
- Expenses
- $13,967
- Assets
- $3,907
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LYNN SHAW (President)
- SUSAN PFEIFFER (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- LYNN SHAW (President)
- SUSAN PFEIFFER (Vice President)
- COLIN LIVELY (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lynns Warriors raises awareness and educates communities about the escalation of human trafficking and sexual exploitation happening in our own homes.Lynns Warriors intervenes to prevent new victims and helps eradicate human trafficking through discussion, digital safety education, engagement, empowerment and resources.Lynns Warriors is committed to ending human trafficking and sexual exploitation by raising awareness through media and grassroots mobilization, advocacy, education and policy.Lynns Warriors is dedicated to supporting and putting forth the survivors voice and lived experience to educate communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Lynns Warriors raises awareness and educates communities about the escalation of human trafficking and sexual exploitation happening in our own homes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 2
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.7%; rating input score 2
- Program expense ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 2
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.3%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 55.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.7% of revenue deployed · 2.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $300 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.