Lynn Canal Adventures

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844443994
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Juneau, AK, USA
Phone
9077231772
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Camps

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,756
Expenses
$88,601
Assets
$95,430
Liabilities
$8,706

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Geoff Roes (Board Vice President and Treasurer)
  • Luke Mather (President)

People named in this filing

  • Geoff Roes (Board Vice President and Treasurer)
  • Tom McKenna (Board Secretary)
  • Luke Mather (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Lynn Canal Adventures, Inc., is organized exclusively for the charitable and educational purpose, as identified under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, to support and provide wholistic opportunities for youth and young adults to grow into tomorrow's leaders through outdoor endurance endeavors such as, but not necessarily limited to, running, skiing, and snowshoeing.

What it reported doing in 2024

Lynn Canal Adventures served 150 youth through four summer running camps. This includes 49 first-year middle school campers, 37 first- year high school campers, and 10 high school campers who earned the coveted "4-year camper" shorts! We also served roughly a dozen high schoolers through our winter snowshoe running club.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 65% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.5%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.5%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 29.1% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.