Lutherdale Bible Camp Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 390963472
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Elkhorn, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2627422352
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,691,023
- Expenses
- $2,025,510
- Assets
- $5,934,427
- Liabilities
- $1,338,480
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL DIXON (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- REV TRACY POLZIN (EXECUTIVE DI): $143,033 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Lutherdale is a place for rejuvenation, learning, fellowship, and recreation. Waterfront activities, field games, archery, the farm, low & high challenge course activities, and a climbing tower along the shores of lauderdale lakes provide opportunities for people of all ages to connect with nature.
What it reported doing in 2025
Summer ministry: lutherdale has over 80 years of experience in running summer camps. We follow over 300 standards established by the american camp association in order to provide a safe space for your children. Our program model is set up around small groups so that ever camper has a cabin leader that will invest in, care for, and nurture your child. We offer full week youth camps for grades 1-12, on-site day camps for grades k-6, leadership exploration and adventure program (leap) for grades 10-12, and adult and family camps. Whether attending a full week camp or weekend camp each camper gets to try new activities and practice skills to learn about what they love. General camp activities include bible study, canoeing, arts & crafts, field games, court games, kayaking, worship, camp fires, swimming, feeding animals and much more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 60% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.4%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 68.5%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.93; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.4% of revenue deployed · 68.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $143K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.