Lutheran Family Services Rocky Mountains
Legal name: Lutheran Social Services of Colorado
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 840775550
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3039223433
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,482,604
- Expenses
- $33,763,491
- Assets
- $12,051,606
- Liabilities
- $6,487,300
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES HORAN (CEO/PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN BRANT (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF PROGRAMS)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMES HORAN (CEO/PRESIDENT): $195,851 total reported compensation
- BRIAN BRANT (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF PROGRAMS): $151,408 total reported compensation
- JULIE TURCK (VP-FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION): $144,458 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Rooted in the values of kindness, dignity, and social justice, LFSRM strengthens communities by providing support, guidance, and resource coordination to individuals and families throughout the Rocky Mountain region. LFSRM depends on generous donations of time and money in order to provide quality services to vulnerable children and families. There are many ways that you, your congregation, and community group can get involved to help us with our mission. DONATE** - Help ensure sustainability of LFSRM programs serving our most vulnerable neighbors.
What it reported doing in 2024
Foster care services: in the past year, lfsrm's foster care programs provided 50,856 nights of care for 220 children and youth across the front range of Colorado who were unable to remain in their home or with family. The program cared for 140 youth who were temporarily removed from their homes due to abuse and neglect, 78 unaccompanied refugee minors whose parents and caregivers were unable to be located after having fled their home countries due to war, unrest or other valid concerns for safety, and 2 unaccompanied children in the custody of the office of refugee resettlement while seeking immigration relief. Lfsrm certifies and trains parents to provide high quality care to children and youth who are unable to be cared for by their biological parents or kin and provides ongoing support and oversight to ensure the health, safety, and wellbeing of children in care. The agency provides evidence based training to ensure families are well prepared to meet the needs of children placed in their homes in a trauma informed manner. Additionally, the agency provides high quality case management and enhanced supports, including mental health services for children and families, and specialize culturally and linguistically appropriate foster care and independent living services that facilitate social, cultural, and economic integration for children who are unable to be reunified with their family or kin. In fy 2025, lfsrm maintained a combined placement stability rate of only 0.9 changes in placement per 1,000 nights of care, far below the state average of 3.4 moves per 1,000 nights of care for the same period.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 91.1%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 89% of revenue deployed · 91.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $30.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $196K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.