Lupus Foundation of Minnesota
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411946191
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Bloomington, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9527465151
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Specifically Named Diseases
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $724,433
- Expenses
- $587,313
- Assets
- $1,838,066
- Liabilities
- $78,361
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- THARAN LEOPOLD (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER MONROE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER MONROE (PRESIDENT): $136,271 total reported compensation
- THARAN LEOPOLD (PRESIDENT): $17,456 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Fund research into investigating the cause, improved treatments and a cure for lupus while providing support to those whose lives are impacted by the disease. While working towards finding a cure, we support those impacted by lupus and promote a deeper understanding of the disease.
What it reported doing in 2015
The lupus foundation of Minnesota is dedicated to realizing our mission of a world without lupus. Our mission is focused on working toward finding a cure, supporting those impacted by lupus, and promoting a deeper understanding of the disease.program efforts in 2015 were aimed at improving the quality of life for people with lupus by providing direct education and emotional support to individuals and their families/supporters. This was accomplished through numerous educational programs and supportive services which were offered to the community, providing a wide range of opportunities to access information and resources and connect with others living with or interested in lupus, including: -community outreach activities and events (health & wellness fairs, walks/5k runs, postcards to clinics/rheumatologists, fundraisers), which provided information, education, and support to over 1,800 individuals with lupus, their supporters, and community members. -26 seminars and classes were facilitated by community practitioners, which engaged 263 people living with lupus and other autoimmune diseases, and their supporters.-five webinars were presented, which provided research advancements and clinical updates about lupus to 595 individuals. -two community presentations were facilitated by lfm staff, which provided information and education to 50 individuals. -320 individuals received (via email, calls, walk-ins) support, consultation, information, and referrals to community resources in connection to living with lupus or knowing someone who lives with the disease; 120 of these participants were new to lfm. -lfm employees, ambassadors and spokespeople participated in television appearances or radio interviews in order to increase public awareness of lupus. Specifically, television appearances were with kare 11, wcco, kstp in the twin cities; kttc in rochester; and wdio and kbjr in duluth. Radio stations that hosted lfm included: bob 106.1 fm and red rock radio stations of duluth.-in print media, Minnesota health care news featured a "lupus primer" article, a collaboration of lfm president and an lfm-funded researcher, in their september issue. -lupus ambassadors were featured in city-specific publications. Starting in 2015, lfm made a concerted effort to publicize programming and upcoming events on community calendars; dozens of programs were highlighted in local community newspapers, in major newspaper calendars, and in online publications across the state.-lfm's bimonthly newsletter was distributed to over 7,500 unique readers and 2,484 households received the annual printed edition of lupus news with education about disease management and research updates.-social media presence for lfm continues to grow with twitter producing nearly 200,000 organic impressions. Facebook followers total approximately 1,900 and organic impressions reached between 3,000 and 7,900 people during lupus awareness month. A linkedin presence for lfm was established, and youtube channel was maintained, seeing increased followings on both platforms.-a continuing partnership with kfan 100.3 fm reached 65,000-75,000 listeners during the annual 24-hour on-air marathon support lupus fundraising and awareness. As a charity partner of the midwest comic book association, over 10,000 event attendees received lupus and lfm information.-a total of 166 volunteers came together to assist with public awareness and fundraising events. Additionally, nine independent individuals and businesses organized events to raise awareness of lupus, reaching an estimated 3,140 individuals with personal stories, lupus facts, and information.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.8%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 63.6%; rating input score 64
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 32.1%; rating input score 32; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.13; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.2%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -25.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.8% of revenue deployed · 63.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $374K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $136K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 34 of 35 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.