Lumbee Nation Tribal Programs Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562247884
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pembroke, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9105217861
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $123,523
- Expenses
- $7,883
- Assets
- $206,269
- Liabilities
- $7,679
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- BOBBY EMANUEL (TRIBAL COUNCIL VICE CHAIR): $9,000 total reported compensation
- PAM HUNT (TRIBAL COUNCIL TREASURER): $9,000 total reported compensation
- ALBERT ALEXANDER BAKER (TRIBAL COUNCIL SPEAKER): $9,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide assistance for low-income lumbee indian households.
What it reported doing in 2024
Fema grant funding from 2018 was used to make final repairs to maxton pond.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.4%; rating input score 6
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 93.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 26.17; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -30.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -32.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $9K · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.