Lucky Cat Adoptions Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202133234
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Fleming Island, FL, USA
Phone
8885454167
Rating
95
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$164,062
Expenses
$146,632
Assets
$383,875
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Cameron Moore (President)
  • Johnny Hagan (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Cameron Moore (President)
  • Johnny Hagan (Vice President)
  • Angela Brummond (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Lucky Cat Adoptions is an all-volunteer organization serving Greater Jacksonville since 2005. Our work focuses on two core programs: rescuing at-risk cats from regional municipal shelters for adoption, and providing targeted Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) services.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, Lucky Cat Adoptions sterilized, vaccinated, microchipped, and placed 748 cats and kittens into loving homes. Most were rescued from municipal and nonprofit shelters across North Florida, where they were at risk of euthanasia. Our Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) program focused on underserved areas within the Jacksonville metropolitan region, working to humanely reduce community cat overpopulation in lower-income neighborhoods. In 2025, we provided TNR services for 360 community cats in Duval County, improving animal welfare, supporting residents, and helping reduce shelter intake.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.4%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.6%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.62; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $147K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.