Lucca Charities

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922772511
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Oak Brook, IL, USA
Phone
7734477013
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Federated Giving Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$76,668
Expenses
$24,410
Assets
$103,254
Liabilities
$83

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVEN HARTENSTEIN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEVEN HARTENSTEIN (PRESIDENT)
  • CLAUDIO ULIVIERI (TREASURER)
  • JOHN FASSO (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To aid the general public, with special interest in the hospitality industry, in overcoming challenges and stigma surrounding mental health and cancer. We concurrently aim to uplift and educate the public about mental health and cancer resources and services where they might be otherwise lacking in order to promote awareness and destigmatization.

What it reported doing in 2024

To uplift and educate the public about mental health and cancer resources and services where they might be otherwise lacking in order to promote awareness and destigmatization. This is done by raising funds and granting funds to organizations working in these areas.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 41% for direct work, and 59% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 28.2%; rating input score 28
  • Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 88

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 68.2%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.23; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 55.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 28.2% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.