Lucas Metropolitan Housing

Legal name: Lucas Resident Services Corporation C/o Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272796499
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Toledo, OH, USA
Phone
4192599541
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$200
Expenses
$2,305
Assets
$187,016
Liabilities
$192,156

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SENGHOR MANNS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SENGHOR MANNS (PRESIDENT)
  • ROCHELLE PERDUE (DIRECTOR)
  • EUNICE GLOVER (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create and maintain sustainable housing opportunities, provide pathways to a better quality of life, and empower the vibrant communities where we work.

What it reported doing in 2024

Received the resident opportunity and self sufficiency (ross) grant program which provides funding to hire and maintain service coordinators who will assess the needs of residents of conventional public housing or indian housing and coordinate available resources in the community to meet those needs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,052.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 81.13; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.03; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -72.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -37.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.