Lucas County Sheriff's Drug Abuse Response Team Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
815075376
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Toledo, OH, USA
Phone
4192134823
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,558
Expenses
$14,520
Assets
$134,101
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN THARP (CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DANIEL K CASSAVAR (TRUSTEE)
  • ROBERT LACLAIR (TRUSTEE)
  • JAMES LINDSAY (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the lucas county sheriff's drug abuse response team (dba d.a.r.t.) is to raise awareness about the dangers associated with heroin and other drug use.

What it reported doing in 2022

D.a.r.t. Aims to stop the number of deaths caused by opiate overdoses. In 2022, the organization engaged 327 unique individuals and attempted to link those individuals to treatment services. Since the inception of d.a.r.t., the unit has engaged over 5,700 individuals through 2022. D.a.r.t. Advocates educated a universal audience of 5,158 community members and reached 1,124 adults through community presentations about the dangers of heroin and other drug use. One of the most important outreaches was seen with the youth in the community, reaching 1,261 students from both private and public schools through virtual and in-person presentations due to covid-19.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 25
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 18.7%; rating input score 19
  • Program expense ratio: 35.5%; rating input score 36

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47.3%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.24; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 18.7% of revenue deployed · 35.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.