Lubbock Women's Club Historical Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752788741
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lubbock, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8067636448
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $184,726
- Expenses
- $177,212
- Assets
- $1,031,128
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NANCY BARR (PRESIDENT)
- DEE ANN HOLDER (PRESIDENT-EL)
People named in this filing
- NANCY BARR (PRESIDENT)
- LINDA GREENSTREET (VICE PRESIDE)
- DONNA GRIFFIS (ASSISTANT TR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the lubbock women's club historical foundation is to preserve, protect, and promote the historic and architectural character and heritage of broadway, the overton neighborhood, the central business district and the city of lubbock through activities including but not limited to the maintenance of the building at 2020 broadway ("the building"), lubbock, lubbock county, Texas, and all grounds and properties currently associated with the building and any that may be associated in the future. Further purpose is to educate the public as to the historic character of the community through the acquisition and maintenance of furnishings and decorative items that are appropriate for the colonial revival style building; presenting educatonal programs and events concerning the building; and enabling the public to access the building.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.9%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.1%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.82; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -18.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $177K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.