Loyal Order of Moose Jackson Lodge 1426
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 640328530
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Jackson, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6017205078
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $183,437
- Expenses
- $136,250
- Assets
- $117,711
- Liabilities
- $11,500
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- BRIDGETT MACKLIN (EXECUTIVE DI): $17,049 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Gods homeless haven ministries is a christ centered, 501c3 volunteer-run ministry that reaches out to men, women, and children who may be living in poverty or experiencing homelessness. We seek to be the first step in assisting them to create a new life for themselves. It is a common misconception that the majority of homeless individuals are homeless because they simply do not want to work. To the contrary, research shows that this is true of only a very small percentage of the homeless. Most have fallen on hard times due to job loss, not enough income, substance abuse, and medical problems/bills circumstances that could happen to anyone. God's haven assists homeless individuals in transistion from homeless to a new independent life.
What it reported doing in 2020
Gods haven ministries is a christ centered, 501c3 volunteer-run ministry that reaches out to men, women, and children who may be living in poverty or experiencing homelessness. We seek to be the first step in assisting them to create a new life for themselves.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.1%; rating input score 66
- Program expense ratio: 89%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $171.77 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.7%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.5%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.1% of revenue deployed · 89% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $17K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.