Lowcountry Land Trust Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
570809313
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Charleston, SC, USA
Phone
8435776510
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Land Resources Conservation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,627,339
Expenses
$11,300,097
Assets
$39,285,979
Liabilities
$11,090,925

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ASHLEY DEMOSTHENES (PRESIDENT, C)

Highest reported compensation

  • ASHLEY DEMOSTHENES (PRESIDENT, C): $161,223 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To protect land and water forever, nurture relationships between people and place, and connect conservation to community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Land protection: during fy25, lowcountry land trust participated in fifteen conservation transactions. This includes ten new conservation easements protecting 1,295 acres, four fee-simple purchases protecting 146 acres, and one deed restriction on a .7-acre property. Fy25 land protection projects expanded across coastal South Carolina, from the ace basin to the santee basin. On the outskirts of walterboro, a 561- acre tract was placed under a conservation easement, demonstrating the commitment of private landowners, nonprofits, and state government agencies to preserving cultural history and natural resources. The project helped create a contiguous protected landscape in colleton county, contributing to the quickly growing area's ecological integrity and aligning with lowcountry land trust's recently identified high-resilience zone near cottageville. In addition to acquiring 94 acres of vital farmland on johns island that will soon become publicly accessible via walking trails, field trips, farm stands, and educational programs about sustainable farming practices and land stewardship, lowcountry land trust bought, protected, and transferred three properties for community use and benefit. In partnership with charleston county park and recreation commission, a 35-acre tract in ravenel will serve as an official addition to caw caw interpretive center. In collaboration with the barrier islands little league, a 40-acre landmark project on johns island ensures that a vital green space will remain undeveloped, providing both active and passive recreational opportunities for the community. In partnership with the phillips community association and its residents, a .7 acre site will be transformed into a publicly accessible green space, with the preserved rutledge tomb at its centerpiece, providing a vital link to the area's plantation history and honoring the settlement community's relationship with the land. Lowcountry land trust also helped the red top improvement association conserve, interpret, and celebrate a culturally significant property, as part of its community lands program. Other fy25 conservation easement projects include permanently protecting 1.77 miles of direct river frontage along fee farm creek, adding to the nearly 14,340 acres of protected land along the ashepoo river and its tributaries protected by lowcountry land trust; safeguarding 20 acres of history and habitat in the ashley river historic district; conserving an entire undisturbed barrier island of 28 acres of upland habitat surrounded by 393 acres of salt marsh along the intracoastal waterway; and expanding the conservation easement of an ecologically rich and historically significant property located on the south santee river at the gateway to charleston county along both sides of u.s. Highway 17.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 72% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 52% for direct work, and 48% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 91.8%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.96 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.5%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.48; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 91.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $161K · 19 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.